Legal Developments In Non-Competition Agreements: Episode 6 of Fairly Competing: Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief

Monday, April 15, 2013

Episode 6 of Fairly Competing: Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief

The sixth Fairly Competing podcast, Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief, is now available for listeners and subscribers.

In this episode, John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I debate injunction practice in competition cases. We talk about the differences between seeking emergency temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, and how to gather enough facts in discovery to seek or oppose such relief.

We also examine some of the nuances in injunction practice in our home states of Ohio, Massachusetts, and Illinois, and broadly discuss litigating injunctions in federal court.

You can listen to the podcast by clicking on the link below, visiting the official podcast website, or subscribing to Fairly Competing on iTunes.

Listen to this episode

No comments:

Disclaimer & Terms of Use

The commentary, information, opinions and analyses conveyed on this site by the author do not constitute legal advice and shall not be construed as such. Entries may or may not be updated following the time of original posting.

This blog may be considered attorney advertising under the applicable rules of professional conduct. By using this site, you understand that the information contained is not provided for the purpose of rendering legal advice. Your use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. The author will not provide legal advice without entering into a formal attorney-client relationship. The viewpoints expressed on this site are those of the author only and not those of Clingen Callow & McLean, LLC, its Members or its clients.

Client Engagements

If you want to enter into an attorney-client relationship, we'll need to clear up a few administrative details first.

(1) The first step is for me to clear conflicts of interest. You do not want to disclose any sensitive information to me if I already represent a party adverse to you.

(2) Every relationship requires a signed engagement letter between you and my firm. That engagement letter will outline critical terms and the scope of our representation.

I assist clients every day who have problems related to business transitions, employment terminations and competitive disputes. Do not be afraid to write or call me about whether an attorney-client relationship makes sense for you. It might or it might not, but there is no harm in asking.

A word about legal fees. No, I don't work for free, but our rates, options and fee structures are very competitive. I will be happy to discuss with you our hourly rates, fixed-fee options, and preliminary budgets for the type of service you require.

E-Mail Policy

I receive e-mails every day from readers of this site and I welcome what each and everyone has to say. But I cannot provide legal advice without entering into a formal attorney-client relationship. Also, I ask that you not send me confidential information until a formal engagement is in place. It is imperative that I clear a conflict of interest prior to representing any client. That said, I am always interested in hearing about the general nature of your legal problem to see if an advisory relationship makes sense for us. But no matter what you say, I always respond to e-mail and will get back to you by the next business day unless I am on a rare vacation.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Episode 6 of Fairly Competing: Practical Considerations When Seeking Injunctive Relief

No comments:

Post a Comment